Monday, April 09, 2018

Accounts Of The Surrender Of The Army Of Northern Virginia


On the afternoon of Sunday, April 9, 1865, Confederate General Robert E. Lee commanding the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia meets Union Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant at the home of Wilmer McLean in the village of Appomattox Court House

It was there in the parlor of the McLean home that Lee and Grant discussed terms for the surrender of the Confederate army. The terms provided by Grant were extremely generous ones, even allowing the officers to keep their personal sidearms and swords and the Confederate cavalry to keep their horses. The Union army would even provide food for the now starving Confederate army from captured Confederate supply trains. Grant even refused to take Lee's dress sword. He just wanted the whole sorry mess over with, as did his defeated but still dignified opponent. Lee signed the hastily written terms and both men shook hands. 

In the distance cannons could be heard firing still. Grant is informed that the men were firing them in celebration of the surrender. Grant orders that the cannons cease firing, feeling no desire to rejoice in the downfall of fellow Americans.

Lee would return to his soldiers and inform them of the surrender of the army. Some soldiers would desert and attempt to get to North Carolina and the Army of Tennessee still fighting against Sherman's forces. Others, who were just as tired of the war, of the death and destruction, wanted to return to the homes they'd been fighting to defend and resume their lives and learn if their families were safe. 

Three days later, on Wednesday, April 12th, exactly four years to the day that the first shots of the War Between The States took place in Charleston Harbor, Union General Joshua L. Chamberlain assembles the Union Fifth Corps along the main street of Appomattox Court House as part of the formal surrender ceremony. Around 12,000 men of the Army of Northern Virginia under Confederate General John B. Gordon march past their Union counterparts and stack their arms and furled battle flags. Chamberlain and the Union men reportedly saluted the passing Confederates, who saluted back. 

The following are two accounts of that moment written by General Chamberlain:

The Last Salute Of The Army Of Northern Virginia.
From the Boston Journal, May, 1901
Details of the Surrender of General Lee at Appomattox Courthouse, April 9th, 1865.

LENIENT TERMS OF GENERAL GRANT.

By General J. L. Chamberlain


"Having thus formed, the brigades standing at 'order arms,' the head of the Confederate column, General Gordon in command, and the old 'Stonewall' Jackson Brigade leading, started down into the valley which lay between us, and approached our lines. With my staff I was on the extreme right of the line, mounted on horseback, and in a position nearest the Rebel solders who were approaching our right.
"Ah, but it was a most impressive sight, a most striking picture, to see that whole army in motion to lay down the symbols of war and strife, that army which had fought for four terrible years after a fashion but infrequently known in war.
"At such a time and under such conditions I thought it eminently fitting to show some token of our feeling, and I therefore instructed my subordinate officers to come to the position of 'salute' in the manual of arms as each body of the Confederates passed before us.
"It was not a 'present arms,' however, not a 'present,' which then as now was the highest possible honor to be paid even to a president. It was the 'carry arms,' as it was then known, with musket held by the right hand and perpendicular to the shoulder. I may best describe it as a marching salute in review.
"When General Gordon came opposite me I had the bugle blown and the entire line came to 'attention,' preparatory to executing this movement of the manual successively and by regiments as Gordon's columns should pass before our front, each in turn.
"The General was riding in advance of his troops, his chin drooped to his breast, downhearted and dejected in appearance almost beyond description. At the sound of that machine like snap of arms, however, General Gordon started, caught in a moment its significance, and instantly assumed the finest attitude of a soldier. He wheeled his horse facing me, touching him gently with the spur, so that the animal slightly reared, and as he wheeled, horse and rider made one motion, the horse's head swung down with a graceful bow, and General Gordon dropped his swordpoint to his toe in salutation.
"By word of mouth General Gordon sent back orders to the rear that his own troops take the same position of the manual in the march past as did our line. That was done, and a truly imposing sight was the mutual salutation and farewell.
"At a distance of possibly twelve feet from our line, the Confederates halted and turned face towards us. Their lines were formed with the greatest care, with every officer in his appointed position, and thereupon began the formality of surrender.
"Bayonets were affixed to muskets, arms stacked, and cartridge boxes unslung and hung upon the stacks. Then, slowly and with a reluctance that was appealingly pathetic, the torn and tattered battleflags were either leaned against the stacks or laid upon the ground. The emotion of the conquered soldiery was really sad to witness. Some of the men who had carried and followed those ragged standards through the four long years of strife, rushed, regardless of all discipline, from the ranks, bent about their old flags, and pressed them to their lips with burning tears.
"And it can well be imagined, too, that there was no lack of emotion on our side, but the Union men were held steady in their lines, without the least show of demonstration by word or by motion. There was, though, a twitching of the muscles of their faces, and, be it said, their battle-bronzed cheeks were not altogether dry. Our men felt the import of the occasion, and realized fully how they would have been affected if defeat and surrender had been their lot after such a fearful struggle.
"Nearly an entire day was necessary for that vast parade to pass. About 27,000 stands of arms were laid down, with something like a hundred battleflags; cartridges were destroyed, and the arms loaded on cars and sent off to Wilmington.
"Every token of armed hostility was laid aside by the defeated men. No officer surrendered his side arms or horse, if private property, only Confederate property being required, according to the terms of surrender, dated April 9, 1865, and stating that all arms, artillery, and public property were to be packed and stacked and turned over to the officer duly appointed to receive them.
"And right here I wish to correct again that statement so often attributed to me, to the effect that I have said I received from the hands of General Lee on that day his sword. Only recently, at a banquet in Newtown, glass., of the Katahdin Club, composed of sons and daughters of my own beloved State, it was said in press dispatches that a letter had been read front me in which I made the claim that I had received Lee's sword. I never did make that claim even, as I never did receive that sword.
"As I have said, no Confederate officer was required or even asked to surrender his side arms if they were his personal property. As a matter of fact, General Lee never gave up his sword, although, if I am not mistaken, there was some conference between General Grant and some of the members of his staff upon that very subject just before the final surrender. I was not present at that conference, however, and only know of it by hearsay.
"But, as I was saying, every token of armed hostility having been laid aside, and the men having given their words of honor that they would never serve again against the flag, they were free to go whither they would and as best they could. In the meantime our army had been supplying them with rations. On the next morning, however, the morning of the 13th, we could see the men, singly or in squads, making their way slowly into the distance, in whichever direction was nearest home, and by nightfall we were left there at Appomattox Courthouse lonesome and alone."

Source: Southern Historical Society Papers, Vol. XXXII, Richmond, Va., January - December. 1904.




From the book: The Passing of the Armies; An Account of the Final Campaign of the Army of the Potomac, Based Upon Personal Reminiscences of the Fifth Army Corps by Joshua L. Chamberlain (pp 260-261): 

The momentous meaning of this occasion impressed me deeply. I resolved to mark it by some token of recognition, which could be no other than a salute of arms. Well aware of the responsibility assumed, and of the criticisms that would follow, as the sequel proved, nothing of that kind could move me in the least. The act could be defended, if needful, by the suggestion that such a salute was not to the cause for which the flag of the Confederacy stood, but to its going down before the flag of the Union. My main reason, however, was one for which I sought no authority nor asked forgiveness. Before us in proud humiliation stood the embodiment of manhood: men whom neither toils and sufferings, nor the fact of death, nor disaster, nor hopelessness could bend from their resolve; standing before us now, thin, worn, and famished, but erect, and with eyes looking level into ours, waking memories that bound us together as no other bond; -was not such manhood to be welcomed back into a Union so tested and assured? Instructions had been given; and when the head of each division column comes opposite our group, our bugle sounds the signal and instantly our whole line from right to left, regiment by regiment in succession, gives the soldier's salutation, from the "order arms" to the old "carry" -the marching salute. Gordon at the head of the column, riding with heavy spirit and downcast face, catches the sound of shifting arms, looks up, and, taking the meaning, wheels superbly, making with himself and his horse one uplifted figure, with profound salutation as he drops the point of his sword to the boot toe; then facing to his own command, gives word for his successive brigades to pass us with the same position of the manual, - honor answering honor. On our part not a sound of trumpet more, nor roll of drum; not a cheer, nor word nor whisper of vain-glorying, nor motion of man standing again at the order, but an awed stillness rather, and breath-holding, as if it were the passing of the dead!

Source: Chamberlain, Joshua Lawrence (1915). The Passing of the Armies: An Account of the Final Campaign of the Army of the Potomac, Based upon Personal Reminiscences of the Fifth Army Corps. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons. ISBN 0-553-29992-1  


"Many are the hearts that are weary tonight,
Wishing for the war to cease;
Many are the hearts looking for the right,
To see the dawn of peace."
~Tenting Tonight On The Old Campground (1863)

2 comments:

Steve Gambone said...

Speaking of surrendering... NOT!

Just wanted to let you know C.W. that as a Euclidean I've exercised my Constitutional Galaxy Quest Rights to never surrender to the pc dopes. I don't know if you caught it last year but on July 7, 2017 team snowflake of the Washington Post et al accused Thomas Jefferson of raping Sally Hemmings. No way am I letting those toads get away with that crap. If Thomas Jefferson doesn't deserve a fair trial then who does?

Since I'm a Eucldean and the math dude who discovered the Checkers Conjecture {the notion that Thomas Jefferson derived his phrase 'all men are created equal' from the game of checkers.} I claimed first dibs on defending President Jefferson on these totally made up charges of rape.

My nutty idea on this one is a screenplay of the fun-tivities that blasts the snowflakes back to the ice age. You'll find some useful battle tips in part 1. If you just google "checkers conjecture" in quotes to narrow the search down you should find the thing. The post titled 'The Rape Trial of Thomas Jefferson et al part 1'

Steve Gambone said...

Yes Virginia, your holiday prayers do get answered.

Last July Washington Post liberal extremists accused your son of raping Sally, his black minor slave.
An attack on their hated enemy, Thomas Jefferson.
Even their misspelling her surname with a single ‘m’ oozes out evil intent.

Less than a year past. The truth known. Now proven true.
Sally Hemmings wasn’t a black slave.

Monticello slave Isaac Jefferson, "Sally Hemmings' mother Betty was a bright mulatto woman, and Sally mighty near white...”

Jefferson’s grandson Thomas J. Randolph, “Both the Hemmings girls were light colored... "

Her mother Betty, at minimum, 50% white ancestry.
Sally’s father, 100 % white. Making Sally’s ancestry at least 75% white.

No Court has the power to deny Sally the majority content of her white ancestry character.
A legally and mathematically undeniable self-evident truth.
And the rest of the truth will set Thomas and Sally free.

Was Sally the property of Thomas?
Yes, all wives were... just ask any feminist.

Why didn’t Jefferson free Sally?
‘common law wife’ translated into current spelling: d-i-v-o-r-c-e.

How did common law couples legally certify their marriage under US law?
Free them at 21.

Historical quote, “One distinction accorded to Sally Hemmings and to no other enslaved Monticello family was the freedom granted all of her children after the age of twenty-one.”

All of the above means that Sally Hemmings is America’s third First Lady.
Our very first, First Lady with black ancestry.
A set of legally and mathematically undeniable self-evident truths.

And so by the powers vested in me as President Jefferson’s fellow Euclidean and his defender I now pronounce Thomas and Sally a First Couple husband and wife.

The Washington Post math roasted toasties may now kiss their own butts.

Congratulations Virginia!! Your great Commonwealth is now even more historic.
So break out the red, white and blue rice cakes folks ‘cuz Lady Liberty’s comin’ ‘round yer mountains full circle.