Tuesday, August 08, 2017

The Original Godzilla Actor, Haruo Nakajima, Dead At Age 88

Harou Nakajima, the original suit actor for Godzilla.


Legendary stunt actor Haruo Nakajima, the first actor to wear the iconic Godzilla suit, has passed away aged 88 from pneumonia.

Born in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan on January 1, 1929,  Nakajima began his film career as a stunt actor in samurai films. The most memorable of these was his small role as a bandit in the film Seven Samurai (1954) directed by Akira Kurosawa. The film was one of the major inspirations for George Lucas when creating the Star Wars cinematic universe. 

Nakajima is best known to fans across the world as the original suit actor for the legendary movie monster, Godzilla. 


Nakajima practicing his steps with the bottom half of the
Godzilla suit on set.
  
In his remarkable two decade acting career, Nakajima played the legendary Kaiju consecutively for the first 12 films of the Showa Period (1954-1975) of the Godzilla movie franchise. Starting with the original film Godzilla (1954) till his final performance as the classic city-destroying, radioactive fire shooting monster in Godzilla vs. Gigan (1972) Nakajima brought Godzilla to life in many of the monster's most memorable movies. 

Nakajima, in the full Godzilla suit, on set being prepared for
his next scene.

Of course, it was Godzilla which would inspire a number of popular giant dinosaur scenes and spoofs in films and television shows, including: the female T-Rex terrorizing San Diego in The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) and Reptar, the favorite cartoon monster character of Nickelodeon's animated television series Rugrats. 

As a life-long fan of classic monster films, I remember seeing my first Godzilla films as a young kid in a marathon on Atlanta's Turner Broadcasting Stations (TBS) in the mid 1980s and the impact this cultural phenomenon had on me through the talents of Mr. Nakajima, who brought life and personality in a dinosaur suit. 

Domo Arigato Gozaimasu, Nakajima-san. RIP.

Thursday, August 03, 2017

Regressive Charlotte SJW Radical Has Confused View Of Reality -- And Gets An Education From Yours Truly


We're going deep down the rabbit hole on this one,
folks.

Greetings once again my friends and fellow travelers.

How many people here remember the social "just us" regressive Miss Bree Newsome, who infamously climbed the flagpole on the South Carolina Statehouse grounds and temporarily removed the Confederate battle flag ANV from the monument back in June 2005? 

Yeah, I didn't really remember her name either until she showed up again like a bad case of crabs to offer her somewhat paranoid worldview concerning the upcoming HBO series about the Confederacy winning the war and keeping slavery to the modern age....no really, they are making that. 

Even if I actually subscribed to HBO, I would not dignify such a series by watching it for various reasons. When it comes to historical depictions in a television series, I would stick with the outstanding (if not entirely historically accurate) AMC series TURN Washington's Spies. 

While I would not watch any potential series about a victorious CSA maintaining slavery to the 21st century -- largely because I cannot find myself suspending my intellect, or sense of disbelief long enough to accept such an outcome outside of parody -- Miss Newsome also objects to the series because she feels that her unique mental view of the Confederacy and slavery did in fact survive and continues to this day.

Huh?

The article to the story can be found at the Washington Post HERE. I read it and, well, really needed time to overcome the assault on my intelligence from reading what had to be one of the most paranoid, victim-culture tirades I've read in some time from an SJW regressive. Much like Alice falling down the rabbit hole and ending up in Wonderland where everyone is mad, I felt like I'd just come off an LSD high when I finished reading Miss Newsome's warped view of reality.

This tirade deserves a point-by-point response, so once again your blogger will deliver it here on this blog. As always, my responses will be in Confederate Red. Enjoy.


We don’t need a TV show about the Confederacy winning. In many ways, it did.

By Bree Newsome (Edited by the Man Deniers Fear The Most)
 
Fade in. (Insert Wayne and Garth going "Didi-oo didi-oo didi-oo didi-oo" LOL sorry couldn't help it folks! Party on, dudes!) The scene is South Carolina in 2015. Thousands of mourners fill the street to watch as a horse-drawn caisson is paraded to the Statehouse in Columbia. I know, I was actually there in person. Scattered throughout the crowd are dozens of news crews reporting on the assassination of a black state representative and pastor who was shot to death in his church by a Confederate sympathizer lone wolf gunman who represented no group, just himself and his own mixed-up views on race and racial identity. There’s a close-up as the coffin is unloaded and carried into the Statehouse. The camera then zooms out to reveal a flagpole on the Statehouse grounds and the Confederate battle flag flapping in the wind at full mast. Actually the wind was calm that day and there was no wind at all. The battle flag was not flapping at all, just hanging there limply, sadly. Almost as in mourning as well.
Of course, the scene I just described isn’t a movie scene at all, but events that took place just two years ago on June 24, 2015. And you described them very poorly and factually incorrect. Then again I guess as an "artist" you need to set the tone for your rather subjective narrative don't you? (By the way, not to nit-pick here, but shouldn't you have written: "Fade out" after the end of that first paragraph....I mean if you are attempting to write a proper scene?) The Confederate battle flag continued to fly above the U.S. and South Carolina State flags, which had been lowered to half-staff even as President Obama delivered a eulogy for Clementa Pinckney in Charleston two days later. Uh....what? Um, I might remind you that the battle flag flew at a 30 foot pole on the grounds of the Statehouse by a Confederate monument (which I am certain you know all too well) and that the only US and SC State Flags flying are on a pole on top of the Statehouse itself -- way on top of the building. Now how could a flag flying on a 30 foot pole even begin to fly over two flags at half staff on a pole....on TOP OF A F***ING BUILDING?! Addressing a room that included the (thankfully former and far from lamented) governor of South Carolina and many other high-ranking officials, the president stated that “Removing the flag from this state’s Capitol (From the soldier's memorial on the grounds, for clarity sake)… would simply be an acknowledgment that the cause for which [the Confederacy] fought — the cause of slavery — was wrong.” The Confederate citizen soldier fought for community, family and personal honor. The monument and flag were there to honor them and them alone. Removing it was an act of hatred and ignorance disguised as "tolerance". Worse, it was an act that ultimately helped empower white supremacist idealism rather than reject it.
For a nation that had supposedly settled the issue of slavery in a Civil War 150 years ago, it seems odd that this statement would be necessary in 2015. Well President Barry-O did say a number of odd things throughout his two terms, and SJWs today continue to express some pretty outrageous and bizarre statements here in 2017. (I can’t recall a time, for instance, when a president had to issue a clarifying statement that the United States was on the right side of the Revolutionary War and therefore a monument to King George III was inappropriate in the Capitol.) For one thing even if there were a statue to King George III in the Capitol, nobody today would be making the assumption that it would be there for some dark and sinister purpose. For another thing statues and monuments to British royalty and the Crown's soldiers who fought in the American Revolutionary War would not offend me. I could care less if the Capitol had a monument to British soldier and the King's Colours flew beside it in their honor. I wouldn't personally object to it. Perhaps that’s because most wars end with one side being clearly defeated, its cause and ideology clearly rejected. Not always. By contrast, thanks to monuments, nostalgia and sociopolitical realities that still remain, America has yet to definitively part ways with its Confederate past. You and I obviously have different views of what is meant by "Confederate past". For me and most sane, non-social "just us" warriors, honoring the memory of the Confederate soldier and respecting that service is not really synonymous with some modern-day political dogma.
Perhaps this is why HBO’s recent announcement of a new show called “Confederate,” (BLEH!) which presents an alternate history in which the Confederacy won the Civil War, struck many, including myself, as completely tone-deaf to historical reality. Well, it is alternate-history/fantasy, so "reality" really wouldn't come into play now, would it? It frankly doesn’t require much imagination to fantasize a world where the Confederacy remained undefeated. Tell that to people who write fiction for a living. Good imagination is a major requirement for writing. After all, the current president of the United States received endorsements from various white supremacist organizations, including the Ku Klux Klan, (You forgot to include the fact that President Obama and Hillary Clinton were both ALSO endorsed by the KKK....just saying) a group founded by former Confederate soldiers whose mission was to terrorize newly freed blacks and the radical Republicans seeking to grant them voting rights. This is true to a point, though the history there and connection between the original KKK and the current crop of losers who call themselves that is subject to broad interpretation. I might also add that not all of those who made up the original Ku Klux Klan had been former Confederate soldiers (and indeed a good many former Confederate soldiers had nothing to do with it), some had in fact been pro-Unionists and people who avoided being drafted at all. Just last month, members of the KKK gathered for a rally in Charlottesville, Va., to defend against the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee erected in 1924. An action that was for the benefit of that group alone and done without any sanction -- indeed with a great deal of condemnation -- by legitimate Confederate heritage groups.
It’s also not difficult to close one’s eyes and imagine what America would be like in 2017 had slavery never ended — because it never really did. And here folks is where we find our just how very deep the rabbit hole in Miss Newsome's mind goes. Chattel slavery as it existed before the Civil War merely evolved to suit a more advanced, sleek and efficient economy, but one still built on placing people in chains. Whoo boy, this is going to be some serious mental gymnastics folks.
The United States represents roughly 4 percent of the world’s population, yet holds nearly 25 percent of the world’s incarcerated people. A very sad commentary of the price of American freedom if the stats are accurate. Those incarcerated are disproportionately black, Latino and poor. Sadly also true. This system of mass incarceration is not merely about criminal punishment (comma needed here) or rehabilitation (comma needed here) but is a literal economy. Just as chattel slavery was an economy that generated profit in myriad ways for those who participated in it, private prisons are a multibillion-dollar industry that generate profit from locking people up and forcing them to serve as cheap labor. People are locked up in prison because they commit crimes. Granted some crimes are petty and some criminal laws need to be better done, but there is no vast conspiracy to put vast amounts of American people in jail.
The roots of mass incarceration in the 21st century trace directly to the period immediately after the Civil War and the emancipation of slaves. So.....there were no prisons and no lawbreakers in America prior to 1865? Humm, interesting. Between 1865 and 1866, Southern states passed a series of laws known as the “Black Codes” designed to grant local authorities power to arrest black people for virtually any reason at all and force them to provide free labor via convict leasing programs. Some of the most notorious prisons in the South would be built soon after: Parchman in Mississippi, built to house black male prisoners, where Rep. John Lewis would later be held during the Freedom Rides in 1961; and Angola Prison in Louisiana, erected on the site of a former plantation, purchased with profits from a slave-trading firm. Angola remains the largest maximum-security prison in the country and is notorious for its extremely high prisoner death rates.
Given that the true cause of the Confederacy was slavery Southern independence, did the Confederacy really lose altogether? Um, yeah. Former Confederates were only out of power disenfranchised and denied the legal rights of US citizens, despite the Northern cause of the War being to preserve the Union and reunite the country for roughly 12 years during the period of Reconstruction (1865-1877). Campaigns of terror led by groups such as the KKK were overwhelmingly successful, and despite a brief period of gain for African Americans during which time seven African Americans from the South were elected to the U.S. Congress, by the beginning of the 20th century, white supremacists in the South had succeeded in returning blacks to a condition as close to slavery as possible, and many of those abuses endure today. Really? Please give me the statistics on how many African-American sharecroppers there currently still are in the South right now? And of course there are no non-white politicians, doctors, lawyers, business people, or sports stars anywhere in the South today huh? You just gotta love that good ole boy system, huh? (sarcasm in case it went past you).
So the Confederacy hardly needs to be imagined. Indeed, David Benioff and D.B. Weiss,  the showrunners for “Game of Thrones” who are tapped to helm “Confederate,” didn’t see fit to cast black actors in their current show for any roles other than slaves who are freed by a white savior, the character Daenerys. Wow, uh, do you read fantasy novels at all, lady? Certainly by your rather ill-informed statement you have never read author George R. R. Martin's book series. If you had you would know that was how the series was written and that the directors of the HBO series followed the books closely (well at least as closely as they can given that Martin is taking his sweet time with the rest of the novels). Even in a world of fantasy, the show’s creators struggled to imagine darker-skinned people as anything other than slaves only capable of being freed by a white person. That’s not imaginative, but quite the opposite. Well, I'm waiting to read your upcoming sci-fi/fantasy novel where you portray a person of color throwing off the chains of oppression and fighting back....oh wait. (For the record there are a number of outstanding African-American authors in the science fiction community who have written some great stories worth making into movies and possibly a cable series, or two; but you can blame Liberal-controlled Hollywood for not even looking their way.) In the show’s seven-season run, not a single episode has been written or directed by a person of color. Has anyone fitting your shallow (and might I add: racist?) criteria for a good director or writer actually stepped up to offer? Well, have they?
Imagining a world where the Confederacy won, where the legacy of slavery is fresh and the imagined terror of it ever-present may seem like fantasy for white creatives, but ask most black people living in the United States today. They’ll tell you it’s their reality. At least you were honest enough to say "most" though I doubt even that is true, just the ones who live in that ever-shrinking bubble of SJW paranoia you inhabit, ma'am.


I hope y'all enjoyed this post, and my responses to Miss Newsome's rantings. Now having made our way through the very dark and deep rabbit hole in her mind and found a place where everyone is mad down there, I have only one more message for Miss Newsome and all other anti-Confederate heritage regressives out there:

Bless your little ole heart.

Wednesday, August 02, 2017

Night Sky Photography -- 07-02-2017 -- Luna & Saturn

As I promised y'all in my last post, I was able to get a somewhat halfway clear photo of the moon and Saturn meeting in the night sky this evening. You can see Saturn just beyond the bright slightly cloud-covered moon through the branches of one of my backyard trees.


Unfortunately I was unable to get any other good shots because of the cloud cover that obscured viewing of the planet. I hope you enjoyed my photo though. 

More planetary photography coming soon, until then keep your eyes to the skies, y'all! 

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Night Sky Photography -- 07-29-2017 -- Luna, Jupiter & Spica

On Saturday, June 29th, I took these two shots of the planet Jupiter with the moon and the bright star Spica about fifty minutes after sunset.  

The day before Jupiter had been closer to Luna and Spica in the sky, but cloud cover prevented me to get a good photo. 



In a few days on Wednesday, August 2nd, Luna will be near Saturn in the night sky. I will attempt to get a photo of the meeting weather permitting. Until then keep watching the skies. 

Friday, July 28, 2017

Confused Regressive Birmingham Rabbi Confuses Honoring Southern Dead With Nazism -- Owned By The Man Deniers Fear The Most

Greetings and Salutations everyone!

Today I have another special snowflake for y'all, one that goes all out on the whole comparison between honoring Confederate symbols (in this case monuments to the Southern dead) and Nazism. Yep, good ole Godwin's Law strikes again folks. The main argument used by the Social Just-Us crowd. 

On Thursday, July 27th, this extra-special snowflake, a Rabbi from Birmingham no less, decided to post the following article at al.com HERE. It should be noted that the site's message board is heavily edited and several fact-based pro-monument details have been deleted from comments. So because of this once again yours truly will deliver the proper rebuttal here on this blog. 

As always my responses are written in Southern Red:   


Regressive Anti-Confederate Heritage Bigot struggles to understand Southerners' affection for the Confederacy Confederate Dead -- and fails bigtime!

By Jonathan Miller,
 Rabbi Emeritus of Temple Emanu-El in Birmingham (With special guest C.W. Roden -- The Man Deniers Fear The Most)

I am trying to understand the affection many Southerners have for the monuments and symbols of the Confederacy. That takes an open mind and not one full of SJW nonsense, sir.

Our first home in the Birmingham area was in a neighborhood named after Civil War battles more than 150 years ago. During these battles, America lost 2 percent of its population to battlefield casualties. Actually the majority of casualties during the War Between the States were the result of diseases caught in camp, rather than actual battlefield wounds. No doubt one of many facts you will get wrong. If we consider the wives and sisters and children and parents who grieved for these soldiers on both sides of the war, the number of people who personally suffered grows exponentially. No doubt there, and I do applaud your ability to think of them. Some of those same Alabama families were the wives, brothers, and children of my own great-great-grandfather, a proud Confederate soldier who was killed at Chickamauga. And considering the fact that the Southern states seceded from the Union in order to preserve its way of life which was dependent on the institution of slavery and built on the backs of cruel taskmasters parading as gentle men and women, it is astonishing to think of this war as a moment of honor. Again your ignorance of the details shows sir.
(1) Slave masters, particularly rich plantation owners, did not personally deal with slaves in the fields. Those jobs went to overseers and sometimes black foremen, who were usually the cruel ones.
(2) The institution of slavery unfortunately was in no real danger of being abolished in the United States when the first seven Southern States seceded from the Union in 1860-1861. President Lincoln himself stated on more than one occasion that he had no plans to interfere with slavery in the States that currently practiced it.
(3) Nobody who honors the bravery of the Confederate citizen soldier thinks of that war, or the idea of war itself, as a "moment of honor" in any significant way. That you would interpret remembering the dead and war in such a manner reflects very poorly on your attitudes as a man of faith, and sense of morality as a human being.


Why would people living in Alabama want to memorialize the Civil War, let alone remember these battles as moments of Southern glory? Why do people in my own state of South Carolina remember and memorialize the American Revolutionary War? I mean slavery was practiced in America then too and the institution was in full force even as Americans fought to maintain independence from the British Crown -- the same British Empire that was already abolishing slavery in its other colonies FYI. 
Also I would again stress that honoring the dead and remember the battles does not mean memorializing war, or calling it "glory" dude.

The South lost.
The entire USA lost Vietnam, what's your point?

And as painful as that was for people living in Alabama so many decades ago, I am glad about that. Well glad you are living in a war that ended long before either of us were born. For me I don't dwell on the war itself, just honoring the dead on both sides. It wasn't my war anymore than it was yours. We kept our place in the United States of America. "We?" Um, you didn't fight in the war, nor do you speak for the events that happened so long ago. We are not a group-think collective, Rabbi Social "Just Us" Warrior. We (Americans in 1865) abolished the stain of slavery, even though the legacy of slavery and its later bigotry and racism still make life hard for the people whose ancestors were bought and sold as chattel. That of course wasn't just a "Southern thang" though was it? Lots of blame on racism and white supremacist attitudes to go all around in the good ole US of A in the late 19th to mid 20th.

And slavery, it should be noted (you missed a comma here) made life far more complicated for the slave owners and traffickers and bounty hunters who were sucked into the vortex of exploitation and violence against human beings. No doubt there, it certainly was for the folks who actually had to do the dirty work in the fields too. Slavery was and is morally wrong, and its discontinuance should be celebrated by every person of every color and religious faith. So remind me again what you and your faith (and I don't mean your religious one....or maybe I am considering the "religion" of SJWs is Liberalism first and foremost) are doing about ending slavery that still goes on in Africa and parts of the Middle East today in the 21st century? So why are some in the South in love with honor and respect the symbols of the Confederacy, particularly when they are symbols of people who lost their war and who inflected pain on their fellow human beings? Why do we honor the US flag and have that great big "participation trophy" (oops I mean wall) in Washington DC to the men who died in Vietnam, who participated in a number of alleged war crimes according to some? Humm?

I am a Jew. Really so is my friend Jenna, who also happens to be one of those "in love with" flags, monuments and graves honoring the Southern dead. I am sensitive to symbols which haunt my historical memory. Probably a little bit too sensitive like all Left-leaning twits too. The Nazi symbol of the swastika evokes fear and terror for me. Ah here we go. When I see it, I feel the pain of the terrible cruelty that Germany and Europe inflicted on their citizens and my people. Um, actually "Germany and Europe" itself did not commit those atrocities, rather it was people who did it. Land masses themselves cannot commit crimes. It makes me shudder. I am also presuming you personally were not old enough to have been involved in the Holocaust were you?

I have traveled to Germany. At first, I did not want to go. I did not want to hear the German language or admire German architecture or German culture. So you admit to being a cultural bigot then? Good, the ability to admit ones flaws is the first step to recovery. It brought back too many painful images for me. Again why? Germany has a long and rich cultural identity that existed for centuries, and that is not redefined by the efforts of the Nazi Party. Far from it. Of course I personally don't accept the concept of "collectivist guilt" nor believe that a people are guilty of the alleged crimes of one's forefathers. But I have found my travels to Germany to be healing to some degree.

The German people regret the Holocaust when they slavishly followed history's cruelest madman and perpetuated the worst crimes against humanity. Virtually all of the German people living today of course did not live during the scourge of Nazism and fascism. What would they have to feel any "guilt" over? Again collectivist guilt is garbage. While they may exist in dark alleyways, I did not see any swastikas Did you try the local Hindu temples? or jackbooted soldiers Being a democracy, Germany does not have uniformed soldiers patrolling the streets in any form. or Hitler look-alikes trying to recapture the imagined glory of the Third Reich at its most powerful. Now you're just being stupid to the point of being brain-dead silly. Where are you going with this?

Instead, the German people preserved their history without trying to whitewash it. Good for them. Seriously, I support similar efforts, even though you and I might differ on what would define "whitewashing" I suppose. On the streets of Berlin and Frankfurt and Munich are small monuments of remembrance. "Behind this wall was a Jewish school." "Here was a Jewish home/business." "On such and such a date, Jewish people were gathered in this spot and deported to (name the concentration camp) where they were killed." Sad reminders of terrible events, but I do not deny necessary ones. The victims of Hitler's holocaust of the Jewish People (not to mention any other group -- including some Christians -- that he had no use for) deserve to be remembered with dignity and honor.

Monuments like these, monuments of remembrance (again you missed a comma) remind the people of Germany of the evil their forbearers perpetuated in a brief but devastating period of historical lunacy. Such monuments exist in many countries, including this one. What is your point? In Germany today, the goal of the monuments is not to celebrate German power (comma) or to romanticize the period when the German Volk reigned supreme. Instead, the goal is to remember, to acknowledge responsibility, and then to pledge that this kind of hatred will never be perpetrated in the future against other human beings. Yes, but what does this have to do with Confederate memorials to the dead?

I believe that we Southerners should insist that we erect new monuments. I would agree there. We should not revere the generals and soldiers who lost their battles and died for an immoral cause. If by "immoral" you mean defending one's homes and families from a ruthless invader that sought to loot and plunder said homes and families, then you and I are very much in disagreement. Of course we should remember the casualties and dignify their losses to their family and community. Which is what Confederate memorials and monuments do. Of course we should remember the families who mourned for the dead sons and husbands and brothers who suffered terribly wearing the Confederate uniform and acknowledge their bravery and sacrifice. Wow you and I can agree on that one too! I'm starting to get scared now. But we should not honor the cause for which they gave the ultimate sacrifice. That cause was unjust. I would not call defending home and honor "unjust" though it is not the point. I honor the citizen soldier of the South. I could care less about the Confederate government as an entity.

We should erect monuments of places where slaves were bought and sold. We already have monuments and markers for those dude. We should erect monuments to the unnamed men and women and children whose back breaking work built our economy and sustained the privileged few. Uh we also have those too, though we could build a few more -- without tearing down other monuments or the need to vilify those who honor said monuments. We should erect monuments to the men and women of faith who resisted slavery and worked for reconciliation and wholeness and peace. Dude! We DO have monuments to those people!

The South has many heroes. We should be proud of them and celebrate them. We should also be wise enough to know who our true heroes are.

Indeed we should. In fact allow me to introduce a few of them:



Moses Ezekiel -- VMI Cadet and Confederate Veteran.
One of over 10,000 Orthodox and Messianic Jews
who fought wearing the Southern gray.
Confederate monument to Jewish Confederates in Virginia.


During World War II, it was a US military -- one largely made up of proud Confederate descendants inspired by their grandfathers who helped liberate those nations of Europe under Nazi occupation. Those same Southern-born US soldiers (some of them carrying the Dixie Cross banner in their pockets and knapsacks as reminders of their home) helped liberate those hateful Death Camps and ultimately helped save the lives of millions of Jewish (and non-Jewish) victims of the Holocaust. It was those who honored those same men who wore the hallowed Confederate gray and butternut who defeated fascism and brought Nazi war criminals to justice.


Captain John D. "Stud" Fleming of Columbia, Tennessee and commander
of the B-29 Goin Jesse waves a Confederate flag as he prepares to takeoff
on another bombing run in late 1944.

Oh and just one more thing to add: 




This is a marker placed by some of those same proud Confederate descendants, in honor of slaves buried on the site of an old cemetery near Gastonia, North Carolina. Indeed, these same people -- who honor those monuments, who fly those Confederate flags, who wear those gray uniforms on occasions -- who took the time to clear the land where these unknown graves were once overgrown and largely forgotten. Who maintain it today in memory of those souls laid to rest there, ensuring that their lives are never forgotten again.

How is THAT for erecting new memorials? 



Have a wonderful Dixie day, and y'all come back now, ya hear?